Friday, July 13, 2018

Spotted lanternfly developmental milestones reached

Hello, everyone,

Since my last posting, there have been some spotted lanternfly (SLF) developments.  As you know from previous postings, there is a distinctive difference in appearance of fourth instar nymphs compared with the first three stages.  The fourth instar is bright red with black and white markings, instead of black with white spots.  Fourth instar nymphs appeared on June 29 by two separate observers.  As with earlier instars, this was in advance of the date predicted (July 9) based on a Korean paper tied with our observed first egg hatch.


A second, and more important development, is that first adults were seen yesterday (July 12).  Observers were on-site on July 6 and July 11, when only nymphs were seen, so the July 12 date seems reliable.  The original prediction of adult emergence was July 31 – clearly, SLF development is faster relative to South Korea.  This is probably related to climatic differences.  The Korean paper used simple calendar days, when degree-days would have provided a more realistic result.


We will now be watching for the beginning of the oviposition.  We will be looking for egg masses on various tree species, stone, train cars and parked truck trailers (a rail line and several industrial sites are located in the infestation zone).

Thanks to Corey Riedel (VT Fruit Entomology) and David Gianino (VDACS) for the photos!

We have posted further information on SLF, linked here:

Virginia Cooperative Extension web page:
Spotted lanternfly fact sheet (Virginia Tech):
Spotted lanternfly Pest Alert (Virginia Tech):
              English: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/ENTO/ENTO-265/ENTO-265.html
Spotted lanternfly fact sheet (Spanish; USDA):

VERY IMPORTANT: A web site to report suspected finds of SLF, including uploading of digital photos.:

I’ll be posting developments on this pest here as they develop.

More later!
Doug

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Stem borers in apple

Hello, everyone,
On Friday I visited an orchard with an infestation of stem borers - Oberea, probably Oberea myops, in the longhorn beetle family Cerambycidae.  This species also bores in the twigs of blueberry and rhododendron.  Another longhorned beetle, roundheaded appletree borer, is usually found under the bark of the trunk.  In this infestation, the infested shoots often resembled shoot blight, a phase of fire blight.  At the base of the twig was a tiny entrance hole, often with whitish sawdust-like frass. The long, legless yellowish larvae could be found when tunnels were opened.







More later, Doug



Saturday, June 2, 2018

An update on spotted lanternfly population development



Hello, everyone,

We are continuing our observations on spotted lanternfly, a new invasive to Virginia, that includes all of our fruit crops, hops, forest trees, and some vegetables in its host list.

This week we sampled nymphal populations in the known infestation area in the northern part of Winchester.  As expected, nymphs were found on a wide variety of plants - wild grape, wild cherry, honeysuckle, hackberry, smooth sumac, and poison ivy.  We sampled cultivated grapes - table grapes in an arbor - and found a population of nymphs there.  This is the first record in Virginia on a crop, rather than wild plants.  The nymphs are very active, and jump readily when disturbed!  We found first and second instars - it will be some time before we expect to find the bright red fourth instar nymphs.









More later,
Doug

Monday, May 28, 2018

Thrips and Pansy Spot in Apple

Thrips and Pansy Spot on Apple

At a recent orchard meeting, we discussed a symptom of thrips infestation on apple called pansy spot.  This injury looks like the petals of a blossom, light in color against the color of the apple skin (Fig. 1).  Thrips injury referred to as pitting was recognized in the 1950s (Swift and Madsen 1956); if the injury was no too severe, fruit outgrew the injury before harvest.  A paper a few years later reported a discoloration of apple skin referred to as pansy spot (Madsen and Jack 1966).  Pansy spot was determined to be caused by a reaction to the egg punctures made by thrips (the main culprit was western flower thrips (WFT), Frankliniella occidentalis).  Certain varieties were more sensitive than others, notably McIntosh and Spartan (the variety of concern at our orchard meeting was Pink Lady).  These thrips move from host to host as each comes into bloom – their host range is broad.  Thrips are present during bloom, when they lay eggs in flower parts. The resulting generation matures, and the resulting adults perform additional oviposition into the developing apples.  The apple tissue surrounding this cohort of punctures develop the pansy spot discoloration.  Other apple varieties experienced the thrips oviposition, but did not develop pansy spot.  Madsen and Jack (1966) determined that the best time to apply control measures was petal fall, when nymphs are present but have not produced the offending adults.  Later work on WFT in apple has shown that the highest egg injury is not necessarily associated with the highest thrips numbers (Terry 1991).  Often eggs are laid in sepals or other tissues where the injury does not become apparent.  Eggs are often laid on more mature clusters, and on king blooms rather than lateral buds.

A similar timing to Madsen and Jack (1966), but possibly a little earlier, was determined more recently in British Columbia (Cockfield et al. 2007), who found the greatest impact by a spray resulted from application from full bloom to about 5 mm fruit diameter.  Few eggs were laid in ovary tissue during bloom – eggs in this tissue (most likely to cause pansy spotting) increased starting about 8-13 days following full bloom.  Obviously bloom sprays can’t be used in order to protect pollinators; therefore the optimal spray timing would be from petal fall until 5 mm fruit diameter.

Sampling

Thrips can often be detected by examining the interior of floors, or rapping blooms on a sheet of paper to dislodge the tiny insects.  However, additional sampling methods have been developed.  Different color sticky panel traps were compared in British Columbia (Bradley and Mayer 1994).  Blue and white traps caught 4- and 3- times more thrips than yellow traps.  Several chemical attractants were added, but these did not provide enough added attraction to be worthwhile.  Beating trays still compared favorably for versatility and speed of data collection.

In Australia, sticky traps were found to be better than beating samples, and blue traps were also considered the best (Broughton and Harrison 2012).  Chemical attractants helped with some thrips species (including WFT) but not others.
Environmental effects and biological control
There is variable natural mortality of thrips.  There is a non-feeding pupal stage that occurs beneath the soil surface.  If there is significant rainfall at this time, many of these pupae drown, resulting in lower adult populations.

Various types of ground cover were compared in British Columbia apple orchards: Bare soil, grass and weedy ground covers were compared for their impact on WFT populations. Weedy ground cover increased WFT in trees during the first week of bloom, but this did not cause an increase in fruit injury. The F1 generation of WFT (the generation causing pansy spot) in cluster samples were lower in trees where green lacewing larvae were introduced at bloom. Still, these population differences were not associated with differences in fruit injury (Cossentine et al. 1999).  Nicholls et al. (2000) also found thrips populations were reduced by flowering ground covers, apparently by fostering natural enemies.  Anthocorids such as Orius are effective predators of thrips.

Chemical management of thrips

Thrips are prone to develop resistance to insecticides; it is therefore important to rotate among mode of action classes.  However, options are limited.  In our control recommendations (VCE 2018), the following materials are listed for thrips on stone fruits (we have not included thrips in the apple section until now; the peach materials are also available in apple): Assail (G), Delegate (E), Entrust (E), Lannate (G).  Another material, with an additional mode of action is Surround (kaolin).  This may be an effective tool against WFT; Larentzaki et al. (2008), reported that kaolin increased mortality, decreased oviposition, and decreased hatch of eggs in onion thrips, Thrips tabaci.

At our orchard meeting, we discussed the potential impact of the plant growth regulator Apogee (prohexadione-calcium).  While there is little information on the efficacy of this use, there has been some promising research on effect of Apogee on other insects.  Paulson et al. (2005) examined the role against pear psylla (PP), spirea aphid (SA) and obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR).  PP populations were reduced in pear, as well as SA and OBLR in apple.  Not only was there direct mortality, but there was a synergistic effect against PP and SA when imidacloprid was added.  Tsagkarakis et al. (2012) reported that Apogee reduced egg production and survival of Asiatic citrus psyllid.  There should be research to further investigate the role of Apogee since not all studies have been consistent – for example, no effect was reported for potato psyllid (Prager et al. 2013).

References

Bradley, S. J., and D. F. Mayer. 1994. Evaluation of monitoring methods for western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), during the blossom period of 'Granny Smith' apples. J. Entomol. Soc. Brit. Colum. 91.
Broughton, S., and J. Harrison. 2012. Evaluation of monitoring methods for thrips and the effect of trap colour and semiochemicals on sticky trap capture of thrips (Thysanoptera) and beneficial insects (Syrphidae, Hemerobiidae) in deciduous fruit trees in Western Australia. Crop Protect. 42: 156-163.
Cockfield, D., E. H. Beers, D. R. Horton, and E. Miliczky. 2007. Timing of oviposition by western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in apple fruit. J. Entomol. Soc. Brit. Colum. 104: 45-53.
Cossentine, J. E., E. J. Hogue, and L. B. M. Jensen. 1999. The influence of orchard ground cover and introduced green lacewings on spring populations of western flower thrips in apple orchards. J. Entomol. Soc. Brit. Colum. 96.
Larentzaki, E., A. M. Shelton, and J. Plate. 2008. Effect of kaolin particle film on Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), oviposition, feeding and development on onions: A lab and field case study. Crop Protect. 27: 727-734.
Madsen, H. F., and I. D. Jack. 1966 The relation of thrips to pansy spot on apples. Can. Entomol. 98: 903-908.
Nicholls, C. I., M. P. Parrella, and M. A. Altieri. 2000. Reducing the abundance of leafhoppers and thrips in a northern California organic vineyard through maintenance of full season floral diversity with summer cover crops. Agric. Forest Entomol. 2: 107 - 113.
Paulson, G. S., L. A. Hull, and D. J. Biddinger. 2005. Effect of a plant growth regulator prohexadione-calcium on insect pests of apple and pear. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 423-431.
Prager, S. M., O. M. Lewis, K. Vaughn, and N. Nansen. 2013. Oviposition and feeding by Bactericera cockerelli (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in response to a solar protectant applied to potato plants. Crop Protect. 45: 57-62.
Swift, J. E., and H. F. Madsen. 1956. Thrips damage to apple. J. Econ. Entomol. 49: 398-399.
Terry, L. I. 1991. Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) oviposition in apple buds: Role of bloom state, blossom phenology, and population density. Environ. Entomol. 20: 1568-1576.
Tsagkarakis, A. E., M. E. Rogers, and T. M. Spann. 2012. Applications of plant growth regulators to container-grown citrus trees affect the biology and behavior of the Asian citrus psyllid. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 137: 3-10.
VCE.  2018.  2018 Spray Bulletin for Commercial Tree Fruit Growers. Va. Coop. Ext. Serv. Publ. 456-419.  

Monday, May 14, 2018

Insects today: grape tumid gall and eightspotted forester

Hello everyone,

Today I came upon an adult eight-spotted forester, shown here:


Larvae will feed on grape foliage, but are seldom in high enough numbers to warrant treatment.  But the larvae are conspicuous (and rather pretty!) and may get your attention.  See the following link for more information:

http://www.virginiafruit.ento.vt.edu/8spot.html

Today I received a question on the use of Movento for grape tumid gall.  GTG is a cecidomyiid, a tiny fly resembling a mosquito in the adult stage (but non-biting!).  Ovipositing females insert eggs into a range of grape tissues, which give rise to reddish galls on petioles, shoots, rachis, etc.  Normally numbers are low, but some varieties are sensitive, and control may be be needed.  There is no specific monitoring method for GTG adults - if needed (on sensitive varieties with a history of infestation), apply when first galls appear.  More information can be found in the linked page:

http://www.virginiafruit.ento.vt.edu/grapegalls.html

 More later,
Doug




Sunday, May 13, 2018

First hatch of spotted lanternfly eggs

Hello everyone,

This week (Wednesday, May 9) we had the first egg hatch of spotted lanternfly in Winchester (the only site with confirmed presence of SLF).  On Tuesday we examined eggs on trees in the infested area, with no sign of hatch.  When the same trees were examined on Wednesday early in the day, young first instars (still pale in color) were seen clustered on an egg mass (photographed by Eric Day of the Dept. of Entomology).  Later in the day, Mark Sutphin (VCE - Frederick County) photographed darkened nymphs with white spotson the same trees - so we are recording May 9 and the first egg hatch.

If you find nymphs like this (black with white spots), please report it using our reporting web site (https://ask.extension.org/groups/1981/ask).  We need to know of any infestations outside of the known area in the north part of Winchester.

More later!

Doug


color were seen clustered on an egg mass (photographed by Eric Day of the Dept. of Entomology).  Later in the day, Mark Sutphin Winchester) photographed darkened nymphs on the same trees - so we are recording May 9 and the first egg hatch.

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Bud swell in grapes: Grape flea beetle and climbing cutworms

Hello, everyone,
At yesterday's vineyard IPM workshop n Madison County, vines were at bud swell.  This is a key time for a couple of pests.




Grape flea beetle adults feed on primary buds at this time.  This is mainly a problem in parts of blocks near wooded edges - but in such rows I have seen 40% of the primary buds destroyed.  This is a metallic blue-green beetle that is almost 5 mm long. Adults overwinter in debris in and near the vineyard. They become active early in the spring and lay eggs in cracks in the bark, at bases of buds, between bud scales, and on leaves. Eggs are light yellow and are laid in masses; they hatch in a few days and larvae feed on grape leaves for 3-4 weeks. Larvae are brown with black spots, and reach a length of 10 mm. Larval feeding damage consists of characteristic chain-like feeding marks on leaves, although occasionally this injury may appear more extensive. However, the damage by adult grape flea beetles is more important. The beetles eat holes into the sides of buds and gouge out the contents as the buds swell. Such injury occurs most prominently on thick-leaved grapes which have large buds, such as the American cultivars `Concord' and `Niagara'. It should be noted that climbing cutworms can cause similar damage. However, damage by the latter pest complex is usually more ragged in appearance. Adults also feed on the unfolding leaves.  For more information, visit http://www.virginiafruit.ento.vt.edu/GFB.html.

Climbing cutworms also attack primary buds, but injury can be more generally distributed throughout the block. 
The biology of the various climbing cutworms varies considerably but the peak flight periods and generations for some of the common species are listed above. The most common species have one or two generations per year and overwinter as half-grown larvae on the soil in leaf litter and orchard debris. A few other species overwinter as eggs or even as adults. The species which overwinter as larvae begin to become active as the weather warms, generally in mid-April. This group of moths derives its name from the larval habit of climbing trees to feed on buds and young foliage during the night, and then crawling back down to the ground to seek shelter under leaf litter, killed grass, or debris on the vineyard floor during the day. The larvae often curl up tightly when disturbed. Hundreds of larvae may feed on a single tree. The larvae mature by May and enter the soil to construct pupal chambers. In two-generation species, second generation feeding is minor. 
Most injury from climbing cutworms occurs in the spring when they feed on primary buds or young shoots. In severe cases, all buds may be killed, so that growth is delayed considerably compared to uninjured cordons.  While growth will likely resume later from secondary or tertiary buds, yield from such shoots is reduced, and harvest maturity is erratic, especially when considering bunches produced on other, uninjured vines.  For more information, visit http://www.virginiafruit.ento.vt.edu/cutwormsgrape.html.

More later,
Doug

Spotted lanternfly developmental milestones reached

Hello, everyone, Since my last posting, there have been some spotted lanternfly (SLF) developments.   As you know from previous po...

Indicia statement

Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of age, color, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, political affiliation, race, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, veteran status, or any other basis protected by law. An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; M. Ray McKinnie, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State University, Petersburg.