Since its introduction and spread in
the US from 2008-2012, spotted-wing drosophila (SWD), Drosophila suzukii
(Matsumura), SWD has presented a huge problem for berry growers. SWD
is a difficult pest to control. Because
of its high fecundity and number of generations, there is a high risk of
insecticide resistance. Consequently,
growers should use a combination of tactics.
Because of the need to rely on non-chemical approaches as much as
possible, there will be overlap in approaches between conventional and organic
growers as they work to manage this common problem. Nevertheless, because of specific concerns
and constraints between the two groups of growers, specific comments will be
made.
Fig.1.
Spotted-wing drosophila adults. a. male showing black spots near wing-tip. b. serrated
ovipositor of female.
Hosts: Hosts include caneberries, blueberries, strawberries, grapes
and cherries. Caneberries and
blueberries are at greatest risk. Grape
is not an ideal host, with lower attack and survival rates than other berry
crops. Nevertheless, attacks by SWD can
give rise to larval infestation and resulting sour rot. There are differing levels of susceptibility
among different winegrape cultivars, depending on variety (Shrader et al. 2019), ranging from Viognier (more susceptible) to Petit Manseng
(less susceptible).
Description: By now, most berry growers are familiar with this
insect and its appearance. The adult fly
looks similar to native vinegar flies, with the main exceptions of a black spot
on the leading edge of the wing in the male (Fig. 1a), and the large ovipositor
of the female (Fig. 1b). This large,
serrated ovipositor allows the insect to insert eggs into the flesh of a
ripening fruit, allowing larval establishment ahead of other drosophilids,
which colonize rotting or overripe fruit material. Eggs are white, elongate
oval, inserted under the skin of the berry, with long respiratory filaments
from one end (Fig. 2a). These respiratory horns may be found protruding from an
oviposition site with magnification (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2. Spotted-wing drosophila eggs. a. exposed egg
with respiratory filaments. b. Respiratory filaments protruding from
oviposition hole in a blueberry.
Larvae are translucent maggots 2-3
mm long, with black mouth hooks visible at the anterior end (Fig. 3).
Silvery white tracheal tubes may be visible through the dorsal cuticle with
magnification. Respiratory projections are present on the posterior end,
giving an appearance of being pointed at each end. Pupae are brown, elliptical, about 3 mm long,
with respiratory projections from the hind end.
Larvae are translucent maggots 2-3
mm long, with black mouth hooks visible at the anterior end (Fig. 3a).
Silvery white tracheal tubes may be visible through the dorsal cuticle with
magnification. Respiratory projections are present on the posterior end,
giving an appearance of being pointed at each end. Puparia (covering of the actual pupa) (Fig.
3b) are brown, elliptical, about 3 mm long, with respiratory projections from
the hind end.
Fig.
3. Spotted-wing drosophila larvae in a raspberry (a), and puparium (b)
Biology: In eastern Asia, there are up to 13 generations. A
life cycle can be completed in 8-14 days, but adults can live up to 9
weeks. Females use the atypically large ovipositor to lay eggs in fruits
as they are ripening, earlier than other drosophila species. Eggs are
inserted under the skin of ripening fruit; each female lays 7-16 eggs/day. Eggs
hatch in 1-3 days, and larval feeding on the flesh causes a collapse of
localized tissue after another 2 days, followed by growth of fungal or
bacterial organisms. Updates will be
posted in the spotted-wing drosophila page within the Virginia Fruit web site: https://www.virginiafruit.ento.vt.edu/SWD.html
Monitoring: In general, traps
are not powerful enough to serve as a control.
Traps should be used to detect activity, and when flies are detected,
make sure that other control measures are in place. Several commercial traps are available (Trece
and Scentry). A trapping guide has been posted (Wallingford et al. 2018), with discussion of several baits, and comparing commercial
with homemade traps. Traps using homemade baits of either yeast or apple
cider vinegar may be used for monitoring. Traps using apple cider vinegar
(ACV) alone are attractive to flies and less odorous to work with than with
yeast added; traps with added yeast may be somewhat more sensitive, but fluid should
be replaced with each service of the traps.
A combination of ACV and red wine (60:40) is more attractive than ACV
alone (Shrader 2017). If available, brown rice vinegar is more attractive
than ACV (Willbrand and Pfeiffer 2019). Traps should be
checked at least weekly. Most of the Drosophila flies collected
will not be SWD, so the flies collected must be checked carefully.
Control:
Chemical control:
Control measures are directed against the adults; there are no effective
controls for larvae in the fruit. As vulnerable fruit approach
ripeness, weekly spray applications should be made. Because of the high number of offspring and number of
generations, there is a high risk of
development of insecticide resistance.
Consequently, insecticides with different mode of actions should
be rotated to prolong the effective life of insecticides.
Organophosphates (malathion and phosmet) are effective (check labels for
registrations on specific crops), as are pyrethroids (be wary of induction of
secondary pests). Spinosyns offer an additional mode of action class,
with spinetoram having greater efficacy than spinosad. See Table 1 for a
list of insecticides available for SWD on the most vulnerable crops.
Included are the maximum number of applications (or amounts of material)
allowed per season and the IRAC class of mode of action. This is
important in designing rotations - it will be helpful to reserve materials
effective against SWD until properly timed for that pest. Organically
approved treatments are included in the table.
It should be noted that the organic materials generally have a shorter
residual life, and lower efficacy that synthetic insecticides. It is also worth remembering that it may be
worth keeping a material in a rotation even if of lower efficacy, to help keep
the SWD population from adapting to other products.
Blueberry Caneberry Grape
Strawberry
IRAC
1A – carbamates
Lannate
90SP
Rate 0.5-1 lb -- -- --
PHI 3d -- -- --
Applics/Season 4 -- -- --
IRAC
1B - organophosphates
Malathion
8F (malathion)
Rate 2.5
pt 3 2 pt 1.88
pt 1.5‐2 pt
PHI 1d
1d 3d 3d
Applics/Season 2
4 2 4
Imidan
70WSB (phosmet)
Rate 1.3
lb ‐‐ 1.3‐2.12
lb ‐‐
PHI 3d
‐‐ 7‐14d (label) ‐‐
Applics/Season 5
‐‐ 6.5 lb ‐‐
IRAC
3A – pyrethroids and pyrethrin
Brigade
10WSB (bifenthrin)
Rate 16
oz 16 oz 8‐16 oz 16 oz
PHI 1d
3d 30d
0d
Applics/Season 80
oz 2 (32 oz) 16 oz 80 oz
Danitol
2.4EC (fenpropathrin)
Rate 10.6‐16 fl oz ‐‐ 10.6‐21.3 fl oz 10.6 fl oz
PHI 3d ‐‐ 21d 2d
Applics/Season 2
‐‐ 2 2 (2.6 pts)
Mustang
Maxx 0.8E (zeta‐cypermethrin)
Rate 4 fl oz 4 fl oz 2‐4 fl oz ‐‐
PHI 1d
1d 1d ‐‐
Applics/Season 24
oz 24 oz 24 oz ‐‐
Tombstone 2EC (cyfluthrin)
Rate ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.4‐3.2 fl oz ‐‐
PHI ‐‐ ‐‐ 3d
‐‐
Applics/Season2 ‐‐ ‐‐
12.8
fl oz ‐‐
(3.2 fl oz/14d)
4PyGanic 5EC (pyrethrin)
Rate 4.5‐18
fl oz 4.5‐18 fl oz 4.5‐18 fl oz 4.5‐18 fl oz
PHI 0d 0d 0d 0d
Applics/Season n/a
n/a n/a n/a
IRAC 5 – spinosyns
Delegate
25WG (spinetoram)
Rate 3-6 oz 3-6
oz 3-5 oz --
PHI 3d 1d 7d --
Applics/Season 19.5 oz 6 19.5
oz --
Radiant
11.7SC (spinetoram)
Rate ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 6‐10 fl oz
PHI ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 1d
Applics/Season ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 5
4Entrust 80W (spinosad)
Rate 1.25‐2 oz 1.25‐2 oz 1.25‐2.5 oz 1.25‐2
oz
PHI 3d
1d 7d 1d
Applics/Season 31 6 5
5
IRAC 28 – diamides
Exirel
10.2EC (cyantraniliprole)
Rate 13.5-20.5 fl oz -- -- 13.5-20.5 fl oz
PHI 3d -- -- 1d
Applics/Season 0.4 lb ai -- -- 0.4 lb ai
Other
IRAC 6/28
Minecto
Pro (abamectin/chlorantraniliprole)
Rate -- -- -- 10 fl oz
PHI -- -- -- 3d
Applics/Season -- -- -- 40 fl oz
IRAC Unknown
4Surround 95WP (kaolin)
Rate 25-50 lb 25-50
lb 25-50 lb --
PHI see label see
label see label --
Applics/Season -- -- -- --
4Grandevo (Chromobacterium
subtsugae strain PRAA4-1)
Rate 2-3 lb 2-3
lb 2-3 lb 2-3 lb
PHI 0d 0d 0d 0d
Applic/Season n/a n/a n/a n/a
1 3 applications per
crop, 6 applications per calendar year.
2 See label. Maximum
seasonal rate depends on use of other products.
3 This rate may be available as a 24C registration;
check for state labels. Full Sect 3 label rate is 1.25 lb.
4 OMRI-approved, suitable for organic production.
Our
Southern Region Small Fruit Consortium provides recommendations for SWD in the
pest management guides for caneberries, blueberries, strawberries and bunch
grapes. In addition, SWD is addressed in
our Virginia VCE Small Fruit recommendations (https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/456/456-017/ENTO-337B.pdf).
If SWD needs to be controlled in a
vineyard setting, it will helpful to make an application just before berries
close in clusters, since many oviposition strikes are in the protected inner
surfaces of the cluster. Surround has been shown to reduce injury by
half, even though this time is well before normal SWD timing.
The flowable formulation of
malathion is safer than the EC formulation, but the flowable formulation may be
in shorter supply. When using the EC (oil-based) formulations, use
caution if also applying the fungicide captan. The oil can act as a
penetrant, potentially causing phytotoxicity).
Cultural control: Netting of 80g weight was effective in controlling
injury (McDermott and Nickerson
2014, Riggs et al. 2016, Ebbenga et al. 2019).
Lighter grades (larger mesh) are not
effective. While netting is initially
expensive, it becomes cost effective because it may be used for several years.
Harvest fruit promptly and
thoroughly to eliminate breeding sites. It is important to harvest all fruit,
including those in the interior and lower parts of the plant canopy. This can be problematic in pick-your-own
operations. This issue should be kept in
mind once SWD established in an area, since at times grape growers may leave
berries on the vine to allow greater development of some harvest
parameters. Any overripe or rotten fruit nearby should be
destroyed. In vineyards, pomace produced during the crushing process
should not be dumped near the producing vineyard block. This can become a
source for many SWD.
When berries are harvested, it will
be helpful to get them as cool as possible, as soon as possible. There is complete mortality of larvae in
fruit held for 96 hours at 35˚F, and below 40˚F, eggs and larvae don’t develop (Bolda 2010, Burrack 2016). In most cases, such uniform holding
conditions are not maintained; fruit cooling should be considered a component
of SWD management and not a sole control tactic.
Biological control: Because of the ability of SWD to encapsulate and kill the
eggs of our native parasitoid wasps, biological control has not been
successful. Research is underway to find
parasitic species that are able to attack this species.
Resources:
Bolda,
M. 2010. Length and magnitude of fruit cooling and spotted wing drosophila
mortality, Strawberries and Caneberries. Univ. Calif. Agric. Nat. Res. https://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=2474.
Burrack, H. 2016. Preventing and
managing spotted wing drosophila infestation. NC State Extension. Entomology - Insect Biology and
Management. https://entomology.ces.ncsu.edu/2016/06/preventing-and-managing-spotted-wing-drosophila-infestation/.
Ebbenga, D. N., E. C. Burkness, and W. D.
Hutchison. 2019. Evaluation of exclusion netting for spotted-wing
drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) management in Minnesota wine grapes. J.
Econ. Entomol. 112: 2287–2294.
McDermott, L., and L. Nickerson. 2014.
Evaluation of insect exclusion and mass trapping as cultural controls of
spotted wing drosophila in organic blueberry production. N. Y. Fruit Quarterly
11: 25-27.
Riggs, D. I., G. Loeb, S. Hesler, and L.
McDermott. 2016. Using insect netting on existing bird netting support
systems to exclude spotted wing drosophila (SWD) from a small scale commercial
highbush blueberry planting. N.Y. Fruit Quarterly 24: 9-14.
Shrader, M. E. 2017. Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera:
Drosophilidae): Risk assessment for an invasive vinegar fly in Virginia
vineyards. Ph.D. dissertation. Virginia
Tech, Blacksburg. 141 p.
Shrader, M. E., H. J. Burrack, and D. G.
Pfeiffer. 2019. Drosophila suzukii
(Diptera: Drosophilidae) oviposition and adult emergence in six wine grape
varieties grown in Virginia. J. Econ. Entomol. 112: 139–148.
Wallingford, A., B. Sideman, and G.
Hamilton. 2018. Monitoring spotted wing drosophila (SWD) with traps. Univ.
New Hampshire Extension. https://extension.unh.edu/resource/monitoring-spotted-wing-drosophila-swd-traps.
Willbrand, B. N., and D. G. Pfeiffer. 2019.
Brown rice vinegar as an olfactory field attractant for Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) and Zaprionus indianus Gupta (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in cherimoya in
Maui, Hawaii, with implications for attractant specificity between species and
estimation of relative abundance. Insects 10: 80 (18 p).
No comments:
Post a Comment